نوع مقاله : علمی - پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 گروه حقوق کیفری و جرم شناسی دانشکده حقوق دانشگاه شهید بهشتی
2 گروه حقوق کیفری و جرم شناسی دانشکده حقوق دانشگاه تربیت مدرس
چکیده
کلیدواژه‌ها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
framing a comprehensive strategy for controlling criminal phenomenons which can provide legislators's goals of intervention is the most important concern of criminal policymakers. criminal justice have this opportunity to face individual people in a society and because of this it can have an important role in implementing and distributing the social justice and policies. in distributing social justice, unequal share of citizens from social benefits should be covered by affirmative actions. one of the means that states could use as these affirmative actions are interventions and responses to the misconducts of citizens. therefore criminal policies should be designed not only to regulate social relations but to take an effective steps toward a better distribution of social justice.
Responsive Regulation is an idea which is based upon procedural Justice and hierarchical Structure that by using its unique mechanisms implement three reactionary theories of restorative justice, Deterrence and incapacitation theory in a pyramid of interventions according to a philosophy based on believing in punishment as last resort, interaction between regulator and criminal phenomenon's shareholders, flexibility of responses and considering the underlying causes of crime and considers every crime as a problem that should be solved by the best possible response.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
1. افلاطون (1384)، دورۀ آثار: کتاب قوانین، ترجمۀ محمدحسن لطفی، ج 4، تهران: خوارزمی.
18. Braithwaite, John (1985), To punish or to persuade: enforcement of coal mine safety, Albany: state university of New York press.
19. Braithwaite, John; Ayers, John (1992), Responsive Regulation: transcending the deregulation debate, New York: Oxford university press.
20. Braithwaite, John (2002), Restorative Justice and Responsive Regulation, New York, Oxford university press.
21. Braithwaite, John (2011), “The essence of responsive regulation”, University of British Columbia Law Review, Vol. 44, No.3, pp: 475-519.
22. Brehm, Sharon; Brehm, Jack (1981), Psychological reactance: a theory of freedom and control. New York: academic press.
23. Burk, R.; Dessieux, O.; Velligan, D.; Tavakoli, A., and Tennison, C. (2010), “Effect of a motivational group intervention on exercise self-efficacy and outcome expectations for exercise in schizophrenia spectrum disorders.” Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association, vol.16, No.2, pp: 105-113.
24. Coffee, J.C. Jr. (1981), “No soul to damn No body to kick: An unscandalized inquiry into the problem of corporate punishment.” Michigan Law Review No.79, pp: 386-459.
25. Garland, David (1985), Punishment and Welfare: A History of Penal Strategies, Aldershot: UK, Ashgate.
26. Gendreau, Paul; Clair Goggin and Francis t. Cullen. (1999), “The effects of prison sentences on recidivism,” Report to correction research and development and aboriginal policy branch, solicitor general of Canada. Ottwa.
27. Husak, Douglas (2012), “The Criminal Law as Last Resort,” Oxford Journal of Legal Studiesm, Volume 24, Issue 2, pp: 207-235.
28. Kinsey, Karyl A. (1986), “Theories and models of tax cheating”, Criminal justice abstracts, September Issue: pp: 402-425.
29. Kramer, Ronald (2015), “Neoliberal states and ‘flexible penality’: Punitive practices in district courts,” New Zealand Sociology, Volume.30, Issue 2, pp: 44-58.
30. Myerson, Roger B. (1991), Game Theory: Analysis of Conflict, Harvard University Press.
31. Nonet, Philippe; Selznick, Philip (1978), Law and Society in Transition: Toward Responsive Law, New York: Harper and Row.
32. Pérez-Garzón, Carlos Andrés (2018), “Unveiling the Meaning of Social Justice in Colombia,” Mexican Law Review, vol. 10, No.2, pp: 26-77.
33. Pifferi, Michele (2012), “Individualization of Punishment and the Rule of Law: Reshaping Legality in the United States and Europe between the 19th and the 20th Century,” American Journal of Legal History, Volume 52, Issue 3, pp: 325-376.
34. Pontell, Henry (1978), “Deterrence: Theory versus Practice.” Criminology. Vol.16, pp: 3-22.
35. Sen, Amartya K (1997), On Economic Inequality (expanded ed.), Oxford New York, Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press.
36. Umbreit, Mark S; Coates, Robert B and Kalanj, Boris (1994), Victim Meets Offender: The Impact of Restorative Justice and Mediation, Monsey, N.Y, Criminal Justice Press.
37. Whitman, James.Q. (2009), “Equality in Criminal Law: The Two Divergent Western Roads,” The Journal of Legal Analysis, Vol. 1, No. 1, p. 119-165.
38. Zalman, Marvin (1977), “The Rise and Fall of the Indeterminate Sentence,” Wayne Law Review, Vol.24, No.45, pp: 48-83.
)