نوع مقاله : علمی - پژوهشی
نویسندگان
گروه حقوق جزا و جرم شناسی، دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی، تهران، ایران
چکیده
کلیدواژه‌ها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
State crimes with the meaning of imposition of damage to the fundamental human rights by the government organization, were appeared with the establishment of the first governments. Moreover, despite precedence, importance and broadness, the various aspects and, especially, the criminological dimensions of them have not been so far scrutinized by the researchers of the criminal sciences. One of the solutions for overcoming this gap is reanalysis of the existing theories with the objective of enhancing their functional levels. Amongst the various approaches that can be utilized for analyzing the state crimes, the present study employs the theories related to the denial and justification of behavior, including neutralization techniques and Defense mechanisms as two supplementary perspectives thereby to elucidate the state crimes based on a descriptive-analytical method. The findings of the present study indicate that the governments avoid accepting their crimes through resorting to a multistage process. It begins with the use of a set of denial methods as outlined in the theory of neutralization techniques (crime, loss, victim and liability), advances towards justification methods (reprimanding of the others and resorting to the superior values) and is completed with the justificatory means stemming from Defense mechanisms. This way, in the first step, the state crime’s perpetration is originally denied by the government. In the second stage, the imposed losses and the victims are overlooked
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
1. ابراهیمی، شهرام (1392)، «تحلیل جرم‌شناختی جرائم ماموران نظام مالیاتی از منظر فنون خنثی‌سازی»، ارتقاء سلامت اداری نظام مالیاتی (مجموعه مقالات همایش چالشها و فرصتهای فراروی سلامت نظام مالیاتی کشور با تأکید بر پیشگیری از تخلف)، به کوشش شهرام ابراهیمی، چ 1، تهران: نشر میزان، صص 30-15.
48. اربی، علی بن عیسی (1381)، کشف الغمه فی معرفه الائمه، تبریز: مکتبه بنی هاشم.
50. Akers, R. L. and Sellers, C. S. (2009), Criminological theories: Introduction, Evaluation, and Application, (5thed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press.
51. Barak, Gregg (1990), “Crime, criminology and human rights,towards an understanding of state criminality”, Journal of Humanjustice, (2)1, pp: 11-28.
52. Bowins, Brad (2004), “Psychological Defense Mechanisms: A New Perspective”, The American Journal of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 64, No. 1, pp: 1-26.
53. Chambliss, William and Moloney, Chris (2015), State Crime, Routledge.
54. Cohen, Stanley (1993),“Human rights and crimes of the state: the culture of denial, australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology”, Vol. 26, Issue 2, pp: 97-115.
55. Dawn, L Rothe and Jeffrey, Ian Ross (2008), “The Marginalization of State Crime in Contemporary Introductory Textbooks in Criminology”, Critical Sociology, Vol. 34, Iss. 5, pp: 741-752 .Available at: http://works.bepress.com/jeffreyianross/57
56. Doig, Alan (2011), State Crime, Taylor & Francis e-Library.
57. Gellerman, Saul W. (2003), “Why Corporations Can’t Control Chicanery.” Business Horizons, 46 (3), pp: 17–24.
58. Geva, Aviva (2006), “A Typology of Moral Problems in Business: A Framework for Ethical Management”, Journal of Business Ethics, 69 (2), pp: 133–47.
59. Green, Penny & Ward, Tony (2004), State crime: governments, violence and corruption, Pluto Press.
60. Grohol, John M. (2016), “15 Common Defense Mechanisms”, Available at: psychcentral.com/lib/15-common-defense-mechanisms
61. Hamm, M. S. (2002), “Stanley Cohen, States of Denial: Knowing About Atrocities and Suffering”, Critical Criminology, 11(2), pp: 177-183.
62. Henry, Stuart and Eaton, Roger (1999), Degrees of Deviance: Student Accounts of Their Deviant Behavior, Salem: Sheffield Publishing. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2018.1452754
63. Kaptein, Muel and Helvoort, Martien (2018), “A Model of Neutralization Techniques”, Deviant Behavior, volume 39. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2018.1491696
64. Kauzlarich, D. and Kramer, R. C. (1998), Crimes of the American nuclear state: At home andabroad, Boston: Northeastern University Press.
65. Kieffer, Scott M and Sloan, John J. (2009), “Overcoming Moral Hurdles: Using Techniques of Neutralization by White-Collar Suspects as an Interrogation Tool”, Security Journal, 22, pp: 317 – 330.
66. Michalowski, Raymond (2013), What is Crime? Why is Criminology?, Northern Arizona University.
67. Moran, Richard (1974), Political crime, doctoral dissertation, University of ennsylvania.
68. Nicholson, Jason and Higgins, George E. (2017), “Neutralization/Drift Theory”, In The Encyclopedia of Juvenile Delinquency and Justice, John Wiley & Sons Inc, 1 edition.
69. Pruitt, William R. (2014), “How Criminology can engage in the Theorizing on Genocide”, International Journal of Criminal Justice Sciences, Vol 9 Issue.
70. Rothe ,Dawn L. (2009), State Criminality: The Crime of All Crimes. Lexington Books.
71. Rothe, Dawn L and Kauzlarich, (2010), David. State Crime Theory and Control in Criminology and Public Policy, Edited by Hugh D. Bar low and Scott H. Decker. Temple University.
72. Rothe, Dawn L. and Mullins ,Christopher W. Southern Illinois University , Carbondale(2009), “Toward a Criminology of International Criminal Law: An Integrated Theory of International Criminal Violations”, International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice. Volume 33, Issue 1, pp: 97-118.
73. Rothe, Dawn L and Ross, Jeffrey Ian (2008), “The Marginalization of State Crime in Introductory Textbooks on Criminology”. Critical Sociology 34(5), pp: 741-752.
74. Ross, Jeffrey Ian (ed.) (2000), Varieties of State Crime and Its Control, Monsey, NJ: Criminal Justice Press.
75. Shigihara, Amanda M. (2013), “It’s Only Stealing a Little a Lot: Techniques of Neutralization for Theft amongRestaurant Workers”, Deviant Behavior 34 (6), pp: 494–512.
76. Sykes, Gresham M and David Matza. (1957), “Techniques of Neutralization: A Theory of Delinquency”, American Sociological Review 22 (6), pp: 664–70.
77. Ward, Tony and Green, Penny (2000), “Ligitimacy, Civil Cociety and State Crime”, Social Justice, 27(4), pp: 76-93.
78. Whyte, David (2016), “It’s common sense, stupid! Corporate crime and techniques of neutralization in the automobile industry”, Crime, Law and Social Change, Volume 66, Issue 2, pp: 165–181.
79. Williams, K. S. (2010), “State crime”, In F. Brookman, M. Maguire, & T. Bennett (Eds.), Handbook on crime, Cullompton, England: Will, pp: 742–761.
)