نوع مقاله : علمی - پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشیار گروه حقوق جزا و جرمشناسی، دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه شیراز، شیراز، ایران.
2 استادیار گروه حقوق، دانشکدۀ علوم انسانی، دانشگاه آیتالله بروجردی (ره)، بروجرد، ایران.
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
Sometimes, it is not difficult to determine the criminal sentence for multiple crimes that the offender commits before definite sentence. However, in most cases, there are such complex relationships between the committed crimes that it is not easy to determine which rule of multiplicity of crime should be applied, leading to disagreements among legal scholars and judicial authorities. Such conditions sometimes arise from the inseparable connection of two or more committed crimes in practice, which is referred to in this article as "correlative crimes". In the system of multiplicity of crimes in Iranian criminal law, the position of correlative crimes, meaning crimes that are interdependent based on the reality of the judicial case - and not merely based on a mental conception - and according to what has actually occurred, the commission of one necessarily entails the other, is not clear, and this situation is primarily due to the silence of the law. This article, using a descriptive-analytical method, examines the position of correlative crimes in legal theories, criminal laws, and judicial practices and concludes that among the existing legal theories and judicial viewpoints, the theory of "sufficiency of punishment for the main crime" has more strength and solidity and can be considered as a suitable basis for fair criminal sentencing and new criminal policy-makings.
کلیدواژهها [English]
منابع
الف) فارسی
ب) آراء قضایی
ج) نظریههای ادارۀ حقوقی قوۀ قضاییه