قرائت های معاصر از سزاگرایی

نوع مقاله : علمی - پژوهشی

نویسنده

دکتری حقوق کیفری و جرم شناسی دانشگاه تهران

چکیده

سزاگرایی از قرن هجدهم و آغاز مناقشۀ توجیه مجازاتِ مغلوب و فایده‌گرایی، نظریۀ غالب در نظام‌های عدالت کیفری بود. از دهۀ هفتاد قرن بیستم و پس از افول بازپروری، قرائت‌های نوینی از سزاگرایی مطرح شد و برای مواجهه با انتقادات سنتی استدلال‌های جدیدی شکل گرفت. پرسش این است که این به‌ظاهر سزاگرایان جدید واقعاً "جدید" یا "سزاگرا" هستند؟ این مقاله نشان می‌دهد که چنین نیست و سزاگرایانِ ادعاییِ معاصر نه سزاگرا هستند و نه معاصر. سزاگرایی از قرن هجدهم و آغاز مناقشۀ توجیه مجازاتِ مغلوب و فایده‌گرایی، نظریۀ غالب در نظام‌های عدالت کیفری بود. از دهۀ هفتاد قرن بیستم و پس از افول بازپروری، قرائت‌های نوینی از سزاگرایی مطرح شد و برای مواجهه با انتقادات سنتی استدلال‌های جدیدی شکل گرفت. پرسش این است که این به‌ظاه...

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

New Versions of Retributivism

نویسنده [English]

  • Ali Saberi
Ph.D in Criminal Law and Criminology, University of Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

From the beginning of the battle of justification of punishment, 18th century,
retributivism has been lost and utilitarianism has dominated the criminal justice
systems. From 1960s, when rehabilitation declined, the new versions of
retributivism proposed and invoked to new arguments to meet the traditional
objections. By developing of this new version, a core question is: “Are these
seemingly new retributivists exactly new or Retributivists?” The paper shows that
the answer is “no” and the so-called new retributivists neither are retributivists nor
new.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Censure
  • Communicative Punishment
  • Expressive Function
  • Moral Education
  • Retributivism
  • Unfair advantage
  • Utilitarianism

مراجع

  1. Armstrong , Karen. (1961).The Retributivist Hits Back. Mind. Vol 70.
  2. Bagaric , Mikro and Amarasekara , Kumar. (2000). The Errors of Retributivism. Melbourne University Law Review, Vol 24.
  3. Bentham, Jeremy.(1843) The Works of Jeremy Bentham( Vol. 1). Ed J. Bowring, Edinburgh: William Tait.
  4. Cottingham , John. (1979). Varieties of Retribution. The Philosophical Quarterly, Vol 29.
  5. Dagger, Richard. (1993). Playing Fair with Punishment. Ethics, Vol 103.
  6. Davis , Michael. (1983). How to Make the Punishment Fit the Crime.Ethics. Vol 93.
  7. Duff , Antony .(2011)Retrieving Retributivism. In Retributivism, Essays on Theory and Policy edited by M. D. White, New York: Oxford University Press.
  8. _____________.(2001). Punishment, Communication and Community. NewYork: Oxford University Press.
  9. ____________.(2003).Penance,Punishment and the Limits of Community. Punishment & Society, Vol 5.
  10. Feinberg , Joel. (1994).The Expressive Function of Punishment. In A Reader on Punishment.edited by Antony Duff and David Garland, Oxford: Oxford University Press,
  11. Gardner, Martin R.(1976) .The Renaissance of Retribution-An Examination of Doing Justice. Wisc. L. Rev, Vol 23.
    1. Hampton, Jean. (1984). The Moral Education Theory of Punishment. Philosophy & Public Affaires, Vol 13.
    2. Hegel, Georg Friedrich. (2008).Outlines Of The Philosophy Of Right. Translated by T. Knox, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    3.  Honderich, Ted.( 2006). Punishment: The Supposed Justifications. London: Pluto press.
    4. Kant, Immanuel. (1999).Metaphysical Elements of Justice.Translated by John Ladd, Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.
    5. _____________.(2002).Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals. Translated by E. a. Wood, New York: Yale University.
    6. Kaufmann, Walter.( 1973). Without Guilt and Justice: From Decidophobia to Autonomy. New York: Peter H. Wyden, Inc.
    7. Mabbott , J. D. (1939).Punishment. Mind, Vol 48.
    8. Moore, Michael.(1988). The Moral Worth of Retribution. In Responsibility, Character, and the Emotions: New Essays in Moral Psychology. Ed F.Schoeman, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
    9. Morris, Herbert. (1994).A Paternalistic Theory of Punishment. In A Reader on Punishment.edited by Antony Duff and David Garland, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    10. Murphy, Jeffry. (1994).Kant: The Philosophy of Right, Georgia: Mercer University Press.
    11. Murphy, Jeffry. (1987).Does Kant Have a Theory of Punishment?. Columbia Law Review, Vol 87.
    12. Quinton , Anthony.(1954).On Punishment. Analysis, Vol 14.
    13. Von Hirsch, Andrew.( 1994). Censure and Proportionality. In A Reader on Punishment. Edited by Antony Duff and David Garland, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    14. _______________. and Ashworth, Andrew.(1992). Not Not Just Deserts: A Response to Braithwaite and Pettit. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies,Vol 12.
    15. _______________. (2003). Proportionate Sentencing: Exploring the Principles, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    16. Walker , Nigel.(1994). Reductivism and Deterence. In A Reader on Punishment. Edited by Antony Duff and David Garland, Oxford,  Oxford University Press.

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار