The Study of Bodily Harms in the light of Zemiological Approach

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Faculty of Law, Shahid Beheshti University

2 phd student criminal law and criminology in Shahid Beheshti University Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Abstract: In modern societies improper economic, political, social and cultural policies have resulted in widespread bodily harms. Improper policies increase the intentional bodily crimes such as murder, suicide and abortion. They also facilitate committing unintended physical harms against individuals, such as harms related to safety, consumption of faulty goods and services, environmental pollution and driving accidents. In tackling these harms, criminal law has a dual approach. Criminal law simply intervenes in interpersonal and minor harms where the relation between act and damage is easy to understand. However, in the absence of a direct and clear relationship between act and harm, it simply passes. Conversely, Zemiology, as an academic discipline, has a more holistic approach to social harms and macro damages which are the center of attention for zemiologists. While it presumes that maximization of criminal law intervention is a harm in itself, it criticizes criminal law for its focus on minor offences. It also emphasizes improvement of social structures and processes rather than punishment as the only means of fighting against harms. Taking a descriptive and analytical approach and relying upon a zemiological perspective, this article studies intentional and unintentional physical bodily harms and addresses the shortcomings of Iranian legal system in treatment of these harms. The article insists the necessity of a holistic approach to social harms and involvement of other social institutes for fighting against harms along with using social responses instead of mere punishment.

Keywords


52. Brisman, Avi & South, Nigel, (2015). “State–Corporate Environmental Harms and Paradoxical Interventions: Thoughts in Honour of Stanley Cohen”, in: Green Harms and Crimes Critical Criminology in a Changing World, Edited by Ragnhild Aslaug Sollund, Palgrave Macmillan.
53. Browne, E.,(2015). Social Protection: Topic Guide, Birmingham, UK: GSDRC, University of Birmingham.
54. Burton, Rachel, (2013). Neoliberalism, Social Harm and the Financial Crisis, Internet Journal of Criminology.
55. Copson, Lynne (2016). Realistic Utopianism and Alternatives to Imprisonment: The ideology of crime and the utopia of harm, Justice, Power and Resistance, Vol 1, Article 5, pp.73-96.
56. Croall, H., (2010). “Economic Crime and Victimology: a Critical Appraisal”, Journal International De Victimologie; 8(2), PP.162-182.
57. Davies, Pamela, Peter Francis and Tanya Wyatt, (2014). “Taking Invisible Crimes and Social Harms Seriously”, in: Invisible Crimes and Social Harms, Palgrave Macmillan, First published.
58. Dorling, Danny, (2004). “Prime Suspect: Murder in Britain”, in: Beyondcriminology: taking harm seriously / edited by Paddy Hillyard ... [et al.].
59. Fagan, Jeffrey, (2008). “Legitimacy and Criminal Justice”, Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, Vol 6:123.
60. Garnier QC MP, Edward (2006). “There Is No Consensus on Policy”, in: Does Criminal Justice Work? The ‘Right for the Wrong Reasons’ Debate, Edited by Richard Garside and Will McMahon, Crime and Society Foundation.
61. Garside, Richard,(2006). “Right for The Wrong Reasons: Making Sense of Criminal Justice Failure”, in: Does Criminal Justice Work? The ‘Right for the Wrong Reasons’ debate, Edited by Richard Garsid & Will McMahon, Crime and Society Foundation.
62. Hall, Matthew, (2013). “Environmental Victims: Challenges for Criminology and Victimology in the 21st Century”, VARSTVOSLOVJE, Journal of Criminal Justice and Security, no. 4 pp. 371-391.
63. Henry, Stuart (2009). Social Construction of Crime, 21st Century Criminology: AReference Handbook / editor, J. Mitchell Miller, SAGE Publications.
64. Hil, Richard and Robertson, Robert Lyle, (2003). What Sort of Future for Critical Criminology. Crime, Law & Social Change, 39(1). pp. 91-115.
65. Hillyard, Paddy and Steve Tombs, (2005). “Beyond Criminology?”,in: Criminal Obsessions: Why Harm Matters More Than Crime, Danny Dorling, Dave Gordon, Paddy Hillyard, Christina Pantazis, Simon Pemberton & Steve Tombs, Centre for Crime and Justice Studies King’s College London, Second edition.
66. Hopici, Adrian, (2016). The Zemiology of Psychiatric Medication, York University Criminological Review, Vol. 1, 43-65.
67. Hopkins Burke, Roger, (2009). An Introduction to Criminological Theory, Willan Publishing, Third Edition.
68. Innes, Martin & Charlotte Leigh, (2011). Mapping and Measuring the Social Arms of Crime and Antisocial Behavior: Toward an Outcomes-Based Approach to Community Safety in Wales, UPSI, Cardiff University School of Social Sciences, king Edward VII Avenue.
69. Lederman, Daniel, Loayza, Norman &Menéndez, Ana María, Violent Crime: Does Social Capital Matter?, First draft: July 1999 This draft: July 2000.
70. Loader, Ian, (2006). “Be Careful What You Wish For”, in: Does Criminal Justice Work? The ‘Right for the wrong reasons’ debate, Edited by Richard Garsid & Will McMahon, Crime and Society Foundation.
71. Moore, J M, Vulnerable Individuals or Harmful Institutions?, Centre for Crime and Justice Studies, 2014.
72. Pemberton, Simon A., (2016). Harmful Societies: Understanding Social Harm, Policy Press.
73. Priaulx, Nicky, (2012). Humanising NegligenceDamaged BodiesBiographical lives and the Limits of Law, Adelaide Law Review.
74. Ratcliffe, Jerry H., (2014). Towards an Index for Harm-Focused Policing, Policing, Vol 9, No 2, pp. 164–182.
75. Reamer, Frederic G.,(2014). “Social Justice and Criminal Justice”, in: Routledge International Handbookof Social Justice, Edited by Michael Reisch, Routledge.
76. Reiss, Albert J. Jr., (1981). Towards a Revitalization of Theory and Research on Victimization by Crime, 72 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 704.
77. Roberts, Rebecca (2011). The Hall of Mirrors: Criminal Justice Myths Uncovered, Centre for Crime and Justice Studies.
78. Ruggiero, Vincenzo (2013). “Crime and Punishment in Classical and Libertarian Utopias”, in: Crime, Critique and Utopia, Palgrave Macmillan, First published.
79. Salmi, Jamil (2004). “Violence in Democratic Societies: Towards an Analytic Framework”, in: Beyond Criminology: Taking Harm Seriously / edited by Paddy Hillyard ... [et al.].
80. Stern, Vivien (2007). Creating Criminals: a Recipe for an Insecure World?, Centre for Crime and Justice Studies, cjm no. 70 .
81. Tombs, Steve and Dave Whyte (2007). Safety Crimes, Willan Publishing, First published.