Criminal Perfectionism

Document Type : Research Paper

Author

University of tehran

Abstract

Perfectionists contrary to “The idea of Neutralism and Moral pluralism” recognize promotion of a good life as a duty of the governments. The main objective of the criminal perfectionism approach is to invoke the “Principle of Limitation of Freedom” for the evolution of personality, protection of common moral values and advancement of citizens’desires that are subject of criminal law. They believe that, it’s not right to leave alone citizens for their individual desires, because persons are not necessarily the best judge in assessment of right from fault in their life. In this study, it was tried to examine and scrutinize this idea, in criminal law and ethics, on the one hand, and political sovereignty instruments in establishing a perfectionist approach in the society, on the other hand. It’s worthwhile that states drive their perfectionism to the valuable options like establishing educative centers, cultural centers and media training, and also avoid from unnecessary criminal conflicts and insecurity of public area by employing non-coercive tools.

Highlights

-

Keywords

Full Text

-

References

24. Ackerman, Bruce(1980), Social Justice in the Liberal State, New Haven: Yale University Press
25. Alexander, Larry (2003),The legal Enforcement of Morality, Malden, Blackwell Publishing.
26. Alldridge Peter and Brants Christje(2001),Personal Autonomy,The private sphere and the criminal law,Hart publishing,Oxford,Portland Oregon.
27. Chan, Joseph (2000),
Legitimacy, Unanimity, and Perfectionism", Philosophy & Public Affairs: 29, pp. 5–
28. Craig, Edward (1998), Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, New York, Vol 5.
29. Devlin, P(1965), The Enforcement of Morals, Oxford, Oxford University press.
30. Fienberg,Joel(1990),The moral limits:Harmless Wrongdoing, Vol 4, New York, Oxford University Press.
31. ____, Joel(1987); Harm to Others; The moral limits of the criminal law, New York, Oxford university press.
32. George, Robert (1993), Making Men Moral, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
33. Haybron, Daniel M. (2007),
Well-Being and Virtue", in Journal of Ethics & Social Philosophy, Vol. 2, No.
34. Hurka, Thomas (1993), Perfectionism, New York, Oxford University Press.
35. Kymlicka, Will(1989), Liberalism, Community and Culture,Oxford: Clarendon,pp. 21-41.
36. Rawls, John(1971), A Theory of Justice, Cambridge, Mass: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
37. Raz, Joseph (1986), The Morality of Freedom, Oxford, Clarendon Press.
38. ___, Joseph(1988-89), Facing Up: A Reply, Southern California L.R. 62,PP.1153–1235.
39. Sandel, Michael (1998), Liberalism and the Limits of Justice, (2th edition), Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
40. Sher, George, (1997), Beyond Perfectionism, Neutrality and Politics,, New York, Cambridge University Press.
194 دوره 3، شماره 2، پاییز و زمستان 1395
41. Waldron, Jeremy (1988-89),
Autonomy and Perfectionism in Raz’s Morality of Freedom", Southern California Law Review, n: 62, pp. 1097–1152.
42. Wall, Steven (1998), Liberalism, Perfectionism, and Restraint, England, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics