Criminal Law and Political Authority: An Introduction to Political Theory of Punishment

Document Type : Research Paper

Author

University of tehran

Abstract

What is the relationship between criminal law and political authority? On one hand, all criminal laws are passed by political authority and their validity apparently depends on this fact. On the other hand, when punishment theorists attempt to justify punishment, they usually try to prove moral obscenity or harmfulness of the criminal act and the offender’s guilt. In the first part of this paper, we define political authority and consider its characteristic features. Thereafter, in the second part, we will try to prove that political authority cannot be established without punishment. In the final part, we argue that punishment cannot be justified regardless of political authority. Hence, as a result of a philosophical analysis of these concepts, it can be concluded that Punishment theory, in contrast to prevalent retributivist theories, is a part of political theory, not a part of moral theory. Therefore, any attempt to justify punishment depends on justifying political authority and is an integral part of political theory.

Highlights

-

Keywords

Full Text

-

References

1. Bentham, Jeremy (1945), An Introduction to The Principles of Morals and Legislation, New York: Hanfer Publishing.
2. Binder, Guyora (2002),
Punishment Theory: Moral or Political?, Buffalo Criminal Law Review, Vol.5, No.2.
3. Blackstone, William (1768), Commentaries on The Laws of England, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
4. Devlin, Patrick (1965), The Enforcement of Morals, Oxford: Oxford University Press
5. Dubber, Markus (2004), A Political Theory of Criminal Law, University of Toronto Legal Research papers, available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=529522
6. Feinberg, Joel (1987
), Some Unswept Debris From The Hart-Devlin Debate, Synthese, Vol.72, No.2.
7. Hampton, Jean (1984),
The Moral Education Theory of Punishment, Philosophy and Public Affairs, Vol.13, No.3.
8. Hart, Herbert (1968), Punishment and Responsibility ,New York: Oxford University Press
9. Hart, Herbert (1982), Essays on Bentham ,Oxford: Oxford University Press
10.Hobbes, Thomas (1968), Leviathan ,Harmondsworth: Pelican
11.Kant, Immanuel (1965), The Metaphysical Elements of Justice, New York: Bobbs-Merrill.
12.Matravers, Matt (2011), Political Theory and the Criminal law, in Philosophical Foundations of Criminal law, New York: Oxford University Press
13.Moore, Michael (1987), The Moral Worth of Retribution, in Responsibility, Character and The Emotions, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14.Murphy, Jeffrie (1994), The State’s Interest in Retribution, Journal of Contemporary Legal Issues, Vol.5.
15.Murphy, Jeffrie (2007), Legal Moralism and Retribution Revisited, Criminal Law and Philosophy, Vol.1, No.1.
حقوق کیفری و فرمانروایی سیاسی درآمدی بر نظریه سیاسی مجازات 171
16.Norrie, Alan (1984), Thomas Hobbes and the philosophy of punishment, Law and Philosophy, vol.3, No.2.
17. Philips, Michael (1986), The Justification of Punishment and the Justification of Political Authority, Law and Philosophy, Vol.5, No.3.
18. Rawls, John (1971), a Theory of Justice, Cambridge: Harvard University Press
19. Raz, Joseph (1981), Authority and Consent, Virginia Law Review, Vol.67, No.1
20. Raz, Joseph (1979), the Authority of Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press
21. Raz, Joseph (1985), Authority and Justification, Philosophy & Public Affairs, Vol.14, No.1.
22. Raz, Joseph (1986), The Morality of Freedom, Oxford: Oxford University Press
23. Raz, Joseph (2003), About Morality and The Nature of Law, American Journal of Jurisprudence, Vol.48.

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics