One of the sentencing institutes that is somehow as same as probation and impunity is Adjournment of the issuing of judgment. When guilty is proved, a judge can issue this order and avoid determining sentence. So, punishment is not applied like probation but it differs from probation because sentence is determined. Therefore, the adjournment of the issuing of judgment is something between probation and impunity: delaying in justice or changing in justice. We say Delay, because it is not compatible with this traditional rule that if the guilty is proved, punishment must be applied. Since punishment is not applied in adjournment of the issuing of judgment, its usefulness is doubt in Iran. In contrast, it must be said that adjournment changes the justice, because adjournment is a new justice institute. This finally results in judgment. This judgment is one of these two: if a person under adjournment obeys the order of court, he will be finally released and if not he will be sentenced. Since the remedies must be paid to victim and the high cost of punishment specially prison is lost here, this situation can be useful for both victim and society.
اردبیلی، محمدعلی (1390)، حقوق جزای عمومی، جلد نخست، چاپ بیستوهفتم، بنیاد حقوقی میزان.
رضایی، غلامحسین (1389)، راهبردهای تعلیق و تعویق در فرآیند کیفری، چاپ اول، نشر میزان.
مصدق، محمد (1392)، شرح قانون مجازات اسلامی مصوب 1392 با رویکرد کاربردی، چاپ اول، انتشارات جنگل جاودانه.
مهرا، نسرین، آیین دادرسی کیفری تطبیقی؛ مروری بر نظام مجازاتها در سیستم عدالت کیفری انگلستان، جزوۀ دورۀ دکتری حقوق جزا و جرمشناسی، دانشکدۀ حقوق دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، با تنظیم امیر ایروانیان، 86-1385.
ب) انگلیسی
Jones, Stephen; Deferment of Sentence, British Journal of Criminology, vol 23, no 4, October 1983.
Law office of Margaret Colgate Love, Alternatives to Conviction: Deferred adjudication as a way of avoiding collateral consequences, Federal Sentencing Reporter, Vol 22, No 1, October 2009.
alipoor, H. and tohidi nafe, J. (2015). Adjournment of the issuing of judgment: delaying in justice or changing in justice. Criminal law and Criminology Studies, 2(شماره 4 و 5), 311-331. doi: JQCLCS-201604-1107
MLA
alipoor, H. , and tohidi nafe, J. . "Adjournment of the issuing of judgment: delaying in justice or changing in justice", Criminal law and Criminology Studies, 2, شماره 4 و 5, 2015, 311-331. doi: JQCLCS-201604-1107
HARVARD
alipoor, H., tohidi nafe, J. (2015). 'Adjournment of the issuing of judgment: delaying in justice or changing in justice', Criminal law and Criminology Studies, 2(شماره 4 و 5), pp. 311-331. doi: JQCLCS-201604-1107
CHICAGO
H. alipoor and J. tohidi nafe, "Adjournment of the issuing of judgment: delaying in justice or changing in justice," Criminal law and Criminology Studies, 2 شماره 4 و 5 (2015): 311-331, doi: JQCLCS-201604-1107
VANCOUVER
alipoor, H., tohidi nafe, J. Adjournment of the issuing of judgment: delaying in justice or changing in justice. Criminal law and Criminology Studies, 2015; 2(شماره 4 و 5): 311-331. doi: JQCLCS-201604-1107