Criminal law and Criminology Studies

Assessing the Criminal Responsibility of Child-Soldiers for Perpetrating International Crimes; A Case Study of Dominic Ongwen

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Heidar Piri 1
Akram Karim Zorab 2

1 Assistant Professor of Public International Law, Law Department, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Kurdistan

2 M.A in Criminal Law & Criminology, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran.

https://doi.org/10.22059/jqclcs.2025.397392.2011
Abstract
The issue of child soldiers lies at the intersection of two concepts: victim and perpetrator. This dual status has not only led to divergent views on their prosecution but has also posed a fundamental challenge to the international criminal justice system. This descriptive-analytical study, focusing on the Dominic Ongwen case before the ICC, examines whether the existing normative framework, particularly the Rome Statute, is effective in articulating the criminal responsibility of child soldiers and striking a balance between their status as victims and offenders.
Findings indicate that international jurisprudence, despite the prohibition on recruiting children under the age of 15, exhibits confusion and a lack of transparent standards when dealing with children above this age. The Ongwen case reveals that traditional criteria for attributing criminal responsibility and general defenses such as duress, necessity, or mental incapacity are insufficient, on their own, to explain the complex situation of these children and are applied restrictively and cautiously. The main contribution of this article is to argue for the necessity of adopting an integrated approach that, on one hand, deals realistically with the principal perpetrators of crimes and, on the other hand, protects children as the most vulnerable actors in conflicts by taking into account their specific circumstances of coercion and victimization. Consequently, evolution in judicial interpretation and normative strengthening in this area is inevitable.

Keywords

Criminal responsibility
Child soldiers
International crimes
ICC
Dominic Ongwen
 
1.       Ambos, K. (2013). Treatise on International Criminal Law. Vol. I: Foundations and General Part, Oxford.
2.       Ambos, K., & Triffterer, O., (2016). Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: Article-by-Article Commentary, (3rd edn, C.H. Beck Hart Nomos).
3.       Bourtzis, G. (2023). From Victims to Perpetrators: The Legal Treatment of Child-Soldiers Who Commit International Crimes, as Children and as Adults, in International Criminal Law, University of Groningen Faculty of Law Research Paper Series, No.5.
4.       Chrysostome, Jean; Kiyala, K. (2019). Child Soldiers and Restorative Justice (Cham: Springer).
5.       Clark, R. S., & Triffterer, O. (2015). Part 3. General Principle of Criminal Law; Article 26. in: Otto Triffterer & Ambos Kai (Eds.), The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: A Commentary, Hart.
6.       Crane D., (2008). Prosecuting Children in Times of Conflict: The West African Experience. Human Rights Brief, (3).
7.       Cryer, R. (2012). Defences/Grounds for Excluding Criminal Responsibility, in An Introduction to International Criminal Law and Procedure, Robert Cryer et al, Cambridge University Press.
8.       Drumbl, M. A., (2012). Reimagining Child Soldiers in International Law and Policy, OUP.
9.       Drumbl, M.A., (2016). Shifting Narratives: Ongwen and Lubanga on the Effects of Child Soldiering, Justice in Conflict.
10.   Drumbl, M.A., (2017). A former child soldier prosecuted at the International Criminal Court. Oxford University Press Blog.
11.   Eser, A. (2016). Grounds for Excluding Criminal Responsibility (Article 31 of the Rome Statue). Nomos.
12.   Gacka, P. (2020). Can Duress Exclude Criminal Responsibility of Former Child Soldiers? The Case of Dominic Ongwen before the ICC, Studia Iuridica, Vol.82.
13.   Grover, Sonja C. (2012). Child Soldier Victims of Genocidal Forcible Transfer: Exonerating Child Soldiers Charged with Grave Conflict-related International Crimes, Berlin, Springer.
14.   Higgs, J. (2020). Militarized Youth: The Children of the FARC (Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan).
15.   Jorgensen, Nina H. B., (2012). Child Soldiers and the Parameters of International Criminal Law, Chinese Journal of International Law, Vol.11.
16.   Krabbe, M. (2014). Excusable Evil. An Analysis of Complete Defenses in International Criminal Law. Cambridge–Antwerp–Portland.
17.   McQueen, A. (2019). Falling Through the Gap: The Culpability of Child Soldiers Under International Criminal Law. Notre Dame Law Review Online, 94(2).
18.   Nortje, W., & Quenivet, N. (2020). Child Soldiers and the Defence of Duress under International Criminal Law, Palgrave Macmillan.
19.   Note, Amy Beth Abbott, (2000). Child Soldiers—The Use of Children as Instruments of War. SUFFOLK TRANSNAT’L L. REV, Vol.23.
20.   Owiso, O. (2020). ‘International Law and the Protection of Children Associated with Armed Forces and Armed Groups: Reconciling Normative Standards on Recruitment and Participation’, Journal of International Law of Peace and Armed Conflict, Vol.3(3).
21.   Schabas, W. (2016). The International Criminal Court: A Commentary on the Rome Statute. Oxford Commentaries on International Law.
22.   Souris, Renιe Nicole, (2019). ‘Virtue Ethics, Criminal Responsibility, and Dominic Ongwen’, International Criminal Law Review, Vol.19.
23.   Stahn, C. (2019). A Critical Introduction to International Criminal Law. Cambridge University Press.
24.   Talbert, Matthew; Wolfendale, Jessica, 2018, “The Moral Responsibility of Child Soldiers and the Case of Dominic Ongwen”, Stockholm Centre for the Ethics of War and Peace.
25.   Weigend, T. (2023). Convicting Autonomous Weapons?: Criminal Responsibility of and for AWS under International Law. Journal of International Criminal Justice.
26.   Werle, G., & Jessberger, F. (2014). Principles of International Criminal Law. Oxford.
 
ج. اسناد و آراء قضایی
27.   ICC Press Release, “Warrant of Arrest Unsealed against five LRA Commanders,” ICC-CPI- 20051014-110, 14 October 2005.
28.   ICC, OTP (6 December 2016), Fatou Bensouda, Statement at the Opening of Trial in the Case against Ongwen.
29.   The Prosecutor v. Dominic Ongwen, Decision on the confirmation of charges against Dominic Ongwen, 23 March 2016, ICC-02/04-01/15.
30.   ICC, Prosecutor v. Dominic Ongwen, Document containing the Charges, 22 December 2015, ICC- 02/04-01/15.
31.   ICC, PTC II, Dominic Ongwen, Decision on the confirmation of charges against Ongwen, 2016.
32.   ICC, The Prosecutor v. Dominic Ongwen (Judgement), 1CC-02/04-01/15 (ICC, 4 February 2021).
33.   ICC, The Prosecutor v. Thomas Lubanga Dyilo, Judgment, ICC-01/04-01/06, 14 March 2012.
34.   The Prosecutor v Dominic Ongwen (Amicus Brief by Justice Francis M. Ssekandi).
35.   The Prosecutor v Dominic Ongwen (Prosecution Closing Brief)
36.    The Prosecutor v Dominic Ongwen (Questions and Answers) (ICC, 4 February 2021), Verdict in the Ongwen trial at the ICC).
37.   The Prosecutor v Dominic Ongwen, Defence closing brief, 13 March 2020, ICC- 02/04-01/15.
38.   The Prosecutor v Dominic Ongwen, Defence closing statement, 12 March 2020, ICC-02/04-01/15.
39.   The Prosecutor v Dominic Ongwen, Pre-Trial Chamber II ICC-02/04-01/15 Defence for Dominic Ongwen Third Public Redacted Version of ‘Defence Brief for the Confirmation of Charges Hearing’, filed on 18 January 2016 as ICC-02/04-01/15-404-Conf (25 May 2016).
40.   The Prosecutor v. Dominic Ongwen (Defence Closing Brief) (ICC, 4 February 2021).
41.   The Prosecutor v. Dominic Ongwen, Initial Appearance. Transcript, 26 January 2005.
42.   UNICEF, 2007, Principles and Guidelines on Children Associated with Armed Forces or Armed Groups (The Paris Principles).
43.   UN General Assembly, ‘Convention on the Rights of the Child, 1989, A/RES/44/25.

Home

Guide for Authors

Submit Manuscript

Reviewers

Contact Us